Attack Blogs and Lobbies Against Maria Divine Mercy, The Messages, and Their Readers – PART II


(For a very basic and quick overview related to the attacks against Maria Divine Mercy, please see  MARIA DIVINE MERCY & THE ATTACKERS)

The Kingdom will be the union of Heaven and Earth
Millenarianism Heresy
Accusing The Messages of being from Satan
Accusations of Schism
Heresy Charges 
Bishop Diarmuid Martin and Maria Divine Mercy
Scriptural Interpretations


As we often do before discussing any given subject, we find the necessity to emphasize that the following article is in no way a tool of slander, defamation, anger or hatred. Rather, the purposes should be perceived as the objective report of an unjustly carried campaign against The Book of Truth. While respecting in absolute terms the beliefs of others, we felt the need to underline the difference between "having different views" and "hating those who have different views". Also, we are in no way defending the visionary and/or her work: although we do see all messages given to her as being true, our mission is not of "defenders" but of "reporters" in good will.



In Attack Blogs and Lobbies Against Maria Divine Mercy, The Messages, and Their Readers – PART I, we have exposed the tactics that some individuals and groups use to discredit the messages contained in The Book of Truth.
In this page, we will attempt to analyze some more aspects of this dark pursuit of destroying these Divine Revelations through confusion, abuse of Church's laws in order to contradict God's Laws, erroneous analysis and misappropriation. Although still a mystery to us, the war waged against these End Times Words of Salvation has truly grown to resemble a revelation from evil and a persecution from Hell.

We have divided our research into the chapters here below: 

1) The Kingdom will be the union of Heaven and Earth
2) Millenarianism
3) Accusing the messages to be "of Satan"
4) Schism
5) Heresy
6) Scriptural Interpretations

The Kingdom will be the union of Heaven and Earth

There has been so much criticism towards this concept due to a spiritual pride equaled only by those sacred servants who believed to know the Heavens better than Our Lord. Nothing has changed.
These people say "This is ridiculous!" or "Where is this written?" or "This is a scriptural error!". They believe to know what is unknown to all human beings and would rather turn blind and deaf than to remain silent and accept, in all humility, what God is trying to tell them.
Do they not know the "Our Father" prayer? Do we not say "THY KINGDOM COME"? What does that mean? It simply means that we are waiting for His Kingdom to come to us on Earth as we say "The New Heavens and the New Earth". Simple as that. We know nothing else, therefore WE BELIEVE.
If we had to explain every mystery in detail (and understand it rationally) we would never recite the "Creed" during Mass and we would not call ourselves "the children of God". God needs children who blindly believe in the unseen rather than critics of theology and eschatology who believe to know all things, visible and invisible.

2)  Millenarianism Heresy

Old PaintingInterestingly, this has been the subject of much confusion as the Church does not approve of such belief. Although clearly written in the Book of the Apocalypse, it was the source of so many debates in past centuries that the Church decided to abolish a belief the same way it abolished (for a long time) the belief that the Sun would rotate around the Earth. Those who declared such things would be called heretics and killed. The Catholic Church, of course, had to change its position as civilization advanced in knowledge. Although, as a devout Catholic man, I believe the Church to hold the Truth, we also know that the Church (as a creature made of men) does not understand several of the mysteries it protects. The Resurrection, for example, we believe but do not understand. The Trinity, also, remains an incomprehensible Mystery as much as the Transubstantiation. We have no true understanding, for example, of the Mystery of the Immaculate nature of Our Lady due to the limits imposed on us by the Original Sin. As the list can go on and on, we must include the Book of the Apocalypse: this book has been studied from the days of its completion and yet no one (from within or without the Church) has been able to decipher the numerous mysteries contained therein. This book, as we know, is sealed until the end time.
The fact that the teachings of the Church are perfect as a reflection of the Word of God (and not of anything created by the men in the church itself) does not mean that what is abolished due to its lack of human understanding becomes a dogma given from the Heavens. God would never contradict Himself by speaking of an Era of 1,000 years of Peace written in His Book while denying it at the same time.
The Catholic Church, let's not forget, has made numerous and grave mistakes throughout its history as did the first Pope, St. Peter. Interestingly, the "rock on which Our Lord founded His Church" lacked in perfection: after having been addressed as "Satan" on one occasion, he denied the Messiah three times as Jesus prophesied. What is God trying to tell us in this? What is God showing us when Judas, a chosen apostle, betrayed His Lord by sending Him to death? From the beginning, the Church made mistakes and, being made by men, we must not be in worship of it, brothers and sisters: we ONLY WORSHIP GOD the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The day the Catholic Church (or any other denomination) will be able to prove the falsity of the "One Thousand Years of Peace" Kingdom, then the denial of biblical passages might be closer to a heresy.
Something interesting is that, while we are forbidden from believing in the Era of Peace as written in the Book of John, we are allowed to embrace the completely false Darwin Theory of Evolution, which many scientists have already denied a long time ago as a deceit toward the human race. Indeed, the Evolution Theory stands in perfect opposition to God's Word since it is no secret its very purpose was to spread atheism. Shouldn't embracing such a lie be considered an anti-dogmatic belief and an insult to the Image of God? Maybe not, considering the Second Vatican Council went as far as to introducing the option to receive the Eucharist in our hands. 

3)  Accusing The Messages of being from Satan

Typically, those who attacked Christ on Earth, saying that He Spoke with the tongue of Satan (evil spirits) were, in fact, the ones who had Satan in them. Whenever people judge others in the name of God by claiming their neighbor of coming from Satan, they project themselves. Satan is very cunning: he will be the "accuser", the one who yells at another person by declaring him/her to be coming from him. This is a simple yet twisted trick. Maria Divine Mercy has not expressed one thought or written one line of her own to defend herself and the messages anywhere on the net. All she has does is release what is being given to her for the good of all and here are the evil attacks from so-called "devout Catholics" who, tricked by Satan into believing they are defending God and His Church, are instead showcasing anger, hatred, persecution, insults, blasphemies and gossip towards their neighbor. That is how Satan works, brothers and sisters. When you accuse and spread lies about a woman you don't know (as well as her family, her past and private life) you are doing what the pharisees did to the Lord.
Satan, first of all, never would give messages of this kind. Never. While he has used (and still uses) some people to deceive the masses, it's always through the lures of the world: money, false teachings, new age theories, empty words, clear contradictions.
These messages are not only perfect in their content and form, but contain the power of the Holy Spirit: they have pushed people to pray more Rosaries and more Divine Chaplet Mercy prayers. They have reminded us of the True Teachings of the Way of the Cross as Christ taught through the Gospels. All this cannot come from Satan. Let's not fall into another of Satan's deceits: to give him so much credit in his subtle tricks as to confuse the Truth with the lies. While he can use some doctrine, he will never keep the Truth Whole, Pure, and Absolute as he will pollute it with lies meant to confuse the minds of the faithful through watered down doctrines. Here below are just a very few examples of what the deceiver of mankind will never do in his task of deceit: all based on what we are told on "The Warning Second Coming", this list underlines clearly the impossibility of Satan's presence in these words –

SATAN would never promote the receiving of daily Eucharist.
SATAN would never incite people to pray the Rosary and the Divine Chaplet Mercy daily.
SATAN would never ask of us to confess at least once a week.
SATAN would never ask of us to love our enemies, our persecutors, those who hate these messages and those who hate God.
SATAN would never tell us to remain silent when being attacked, accused or spat upon.
SATAN would never remind us of Christ as a Judge, but would only and only focus on His Mercy.
SATAN would never tell us the hard truth of what lies ahead.
SATAN would never reveal his own evil plans to us.
SATAN would never create prayer groups of Catholics who work to defend the Faith of the Church.
SATAN would never be able to prophecy with so much accuracy.
SATAN would never glorify God.
SATAN would never ask us to sacrifice ourselves for others, especially those who persecute us.
SATAN would never promote adoration of the Trinity and service toward others.
SATAN would never tell us we must pray to St. Michael the Archangel.
SATAN would never tell us to carry our crosses in humility and joy.
SATAN would never remind us of our sinful nature and human faults.
SATAN would never go against his own plan of changing the teachings and dogmas of the Catholic Church that, until now, are in line with God's Word.
SATAN would never remind us of the gravity of the sins of the flesh.
SATAN would never remind us of the importance of the Sacraments.
SATAN would never call us to penance and fasting.
SATAN would never remind us of our own unworthiness in regards to Christ's Sacrifice on the Cross.
SATAN would never speak against the New One World Religion.
SATAN would never remind us of the need to lead holy lives through obedience of God's Laws and Love.
SATAN would never tell his prophet (continuously) to sacrifice herself, to suffer with Him, to remain silent when being attacked, to strip herself of all pride, to carry the cross in silence as these words are not of hers but of God, to obey Him only in peace, deep daily prayer and self-sacrifice.
SATAN would never tell us we must be humble.
SATAN would never tell us we must always forgive. ALWAYS.
SATAN would never tell us to be merciful and loving to friends and enemies.
SATAN would never speak against Satan and his evil ways in such way and amount.
SATAN would never remind us of the importance of reading the Bible.
SATAN would never declare the Catholic Church to be under the attack of the evil group hidden in darkness.
SATAN would never warn us of the danger of new teachings from what God Has Taught us in the Word.

How can someone who professes this Faith, who proclaims to know the Truth, who believes to know God's Teachings, who claims to possess knowledge through the Holy Spirit and who declares to know the Words of Christ declare with so much conviction that these words are from Satan himself? If someone expressed some doubts, caution, or uncertainty towards the authenticity of these revelations without attacking them, nothing would be wrong.
But if some individuals make this mission of antagonizing God's Words and Works their life's purpose, accompanying their attacks with blasphemous statements against the Holy Spirit by declaring God Himself to be Satan while trying to take away souls from God's Hands, then these same people are completely and utterly blinded by legions of demons from Hell. Whether or not you consciously do this with good or bad intentions, you are making a grave mistake. The Words of Our Lord can NEVER be confused with the ones of the enemy. If some of you do, then you've most likely created a "personal Jesus", a god of your own making who agrees with you always and who loves you more than others. My dear friends, never was it known that we come to experiencing God in self-righteousness and arrogance. Never. If, overtime, we have sculpted a Christ to our own likeness in order to suit our desires while projecting our faulty beliefs and defects onto Him, then we must end our state of denial and go back to the Truth in Faith: that is to read the Word of God in His Sacred Book. Failure (or procrastination) to do so can put us in dangerous spiritual waters, indeed. By making God's Word the Standard, it will be clear that the Voice who spoke through the Prophets of old and the Voice of Our Lord in the Gospels is, indeed, the same Voice Speaking to us in these holy messages of love, mercy, righteousness, purity, clarity, law, forgiveness, wisdom and truth.Here is a message written by Our Lord in regards to what we analyzed:



Message given on Wednesday, August 8, 2012 to Maria Divine Mercy

"My dearly beloved daughter when people ask what I mean by the Word of God let Me explain.

The Word of God, as contained in the Holy Bible, both the Old and the New Testaments, the Word of God, the Truth, is being given to the world through these messages by the Gift of the Holy Spirit.

These messages are being presented by the Holy Trinity and are the only ones of their kind ever delivered to humanity by a prophet. The reason is that this is the last mission, the final form of Divine communication and intervention being presented to the world because of My Second Coming.

Never interfere with the Power of the Holy Spirit for this is a very serious sin. In these messages the Voice of the Holy Spirit is being poured out to save mankind from eternal damnation.You may deny Me, your Jesus, or the Divine messages given to you by My Beloved Mother and you will be forgiven. For all of you have the right to discern such Holy Messages because of your gift of free will. However, when you reject the Holy Spirit and publicly blaspheme against it this is an eternal sin and only a miracle, sanctioned by God the Father, can save your soul. 

You must remain silent if in doubt about any Divine message given to the world and pray for the seer. Pray and follow your faith and continue in your ways of honoring God. It is very important that you do this.

By declaring the Voice of the Holy Spirit to be evil you are guilty of a blasphemy of such magnitude proportions that this is deemed an unforgivable sin. 

You need to ask God to forgive you now, because should you continue to mount deliberate campaigns to block the Voice of the Holy Spirit, the Voice of the Holy Trinity and declare it to be an evil spirit, you will not, nor can you be forgiven, for this is a grave sin. Many well-meaning Christians pull this work apart. The messages, they say, do not conform with Holy Scripture. When they say this they do not know the Truth, which is contained in the Holy Bible. They either attack these messages based on hearsay by others who claim to know the Truth or they declare them to be untrue based on their flawed interpretation of the Truth. Worse still, they twist the truth and compare these messages with new and ludicrous interpretations of the Holy Bible.

Listen to Me now, your Jesus, as I tell you this.

Jesus looking at you

The high priests in My time on earth tried to twist the Truth of God’s Laws in order to justify their rejection of Me. They used lies to stop people from hearing My Voice. They declared Me a liar, a false prophet and accused Me of Heresy. I blasphemed against the Laws of the Church, they said, and violated the Sabbath by conducting the Paschal Meal on a different day to the one they deemed to be correct. They not only misunderstand Me, they out-rightly rejected Me because they were not prepared to welcome the True Messiah at that time. They were not ready. They never thought that they would witness the arrival of the True Messiah in their lifetime. So wrapped up were they in their ceremonies, their hierarchical regulations – which at that time exalted their leaders and placed them on pedestals as the real kings of their church –that they had no room in their hearts for Me, the Redeemer of Mankind. The same will happen again as I prepare the world for My Second Coming. The Pharisees could not understand the importance of humility. They could not accept how God works in that He does not exalt the powerful or the most experienced religious leaders in His Church to unveil His plans, or warn His children. God chose the ignorant, the humble and the generous of heart to deliver His warnings to humanity. He raised the weak and elevates them, through suffering, to become pure of heart so that He can manage how He communicates with them. In this way, human pride, on the part of the prophet, is unlikely to interfere with the Truth. They rejected John the Baptist and murdered him. They murdered the prophets of old. They tormented chosen souls, through whom God communicated with. In your world today do you think it will be any different?

Will you, devoted followers of Me, and those who claim to be experts in My Christian or other churches who believe in My Eternal Father, accept the Word of God today? No. You will do exactly onto the prophets, the true prophets as has been done to them since the beginning. You will vilify them in My Father’s Name.

But remember this. When the Truth is finally revealed to you, there will be no turning back if you are found guilty of the one eternal sin. That is if you blaspheme against the Holy Spirit.

Should you blaspheme against Me, Jesus Christ, you will be forgiven. If you deny the gift of prophecy you, too, will be forgiven. 

But if you block the final plan of salvation by ridiculing openly and gathering believers of My Church to consistently proclaim the Voice of the Holy Spirit to be false and evil, you will suffer eternal damnation."

Your Jesus


4)   Accusations of Schism

Jesus to Mankind, God the FatherAn issue that seems to be predominant here is the schism of the Church. It is truly a mystery in itself to witness the accusations made towards these Holy Messages of Truth, Love, Compassion, Mercy and Righteousness.
One of the main issues seems to be the "schismatic" nature of such revelations. To all those who believe to know all things, here is an explanation: not only are these messages not schismatic, but they are unifying in the Truth. They are truly the common denominator of Faith and all Faiths in Christ without making any distinctions and/or separations between groups, individuals and creeds. God Invites all people to listen to His Voice to reinforce our faith, to find faith, and to be protected from those future events which will put us all in great danger.
These voices spread the rumors about the wrong source: it will be the Catholic Church of Jesus Christ which will suffer a schism created from within it and planned for a very long time.
For those who state the usual paragraph "But the flames of hell will not prevail on the gates of my church" here is something you are missing in your faulty interpretations: Christ, by such phrase, meant to say that Hell and the forces of evil will not prevail on His Church, made by all those faithful Christians of all denominations who will form His Remnant Army at the End Times.
You also seem to forget that the Antichrist WILL sit on the Throne of Peter and will bring the abomination. So, how could Christ say that His Church (who you believe to be the Vatican) will be immune to Satan's power when Satan himself will sit on the throne in Saint Peter's?
Can the Vatican be trusted blindly? Wasn't the Third Secret of Fatima (and still is) totally manipulated? Don't we know that the Illuminati entered the Vatican centuries ago? Didn't the Vatican disobey the Virgin Mary's order (at Fatima) of consecrating Russia to Her Immaculate Heart so to weaken the Red Dragon? Don't we know yet that the pedophilia phenomenon among the servants is related to ritualistic and occult practices hidden behind closed doors? Don't we know of the scandals related to the banking international cartel the Vatican played a huge role in? There are hundreds more scandals and dark secrets that MUST make us suspicious and cautious about who is controlling the faithful.
Did Jesus Christ mean to protect only the Vatican and the Catholic Church (formed by the people) from the forces of evil? Obviously not. There are many Protestants, for example, who live holy lives and love Christ more than many lukewarm inside the Catholic Church. Isn't believing and loving Christ enough for a soul to enter Heaven? Surely, the thief next to Christ entered Heaven on that same day without any Catholic sacrament.
I'm saying this not because I'm anti-catholic (as many of you might falsely state) but to emphasize that the CHURCH Christ talked about (which is mentioned in the Book of Daniel and John) is the TRUE CHURCH: the Remnant formed by all those who truly will remain faithful to the teachings of Our Lord, no matter their denomination. This Church will keep on practicing the Sacraments and the Holy Mass in the same fashion with which the Church did for 2,000 years.
You see? How can the ones who are following these messages be accused of schism? We continue (and will continue) to go to church, confess and practice our faith as we always did until the day when the changes told to us will be introduced. And not only we are not looking forward to the possible split to occur, but we are praying for it to be of little consequence. So, how can we possibly be accused of being schismatic? Not only we are devout Catholics (as we have not created any sects or strange denominations) but we are the ones who pay attention to the maintenance of the Church's teachings. We, indeed, are not the cause of a split: Satan will be. And if/when these changes will occur, we will be ready to leave and continue the TRUE Church's Works elsewhere. What is the issue with this? And what schism are we accused of (along with the messages) when everything is still the same? More importantly: what is the objective of these individuals who are accusing these Messages of being false? Is it done in good faith, love, humility and pure heart? Or, is this done in pride, arrogance, disrespect and ego? Are some of these people "agents" of the Vatican? Yes, some are. For them we shall pray because they are harshly trying to destroy the Most Blessed Trinity's Words for their own purposes. For those, instead, who are doing this out of spiritual pride: we are praying for you, too, to open your hearts to the Truth with simplicity and love; and if you can't find it in yourselves to believe in such Prophecies, then to be humble enough to restrain your words of hatred against something that is unknown to you. And, lastly, for those of you who speak blasphemies against God's Work out of pure ignorance or incapacity to see the Truth: we pray for you too and ask you to pray as well.
As Jesus tells us in these True Messages: to not believe, accept or recognize the Divinity of these messages is not a sin (although His Wish is for all to believe) but to publicly accuse them of coming from Satan's mouth is a grave error that might bear serious consequences.

If you do not believe this messenger of being used by God Almighty, you certainly don't have to worry and spend your earthly lives persecuting her; rather, you might want to use that time to pray, fast, confess and do acts of charity. Not only that: you might want to research within yourself the real reason of such angrily communicated concern for us faithful Catholics. If you are so loving in your concern towards us and charitable intention of underlining how deceived, heretical and schismatic we are, then why fight with insults and defamation towards both Maria Divine Mercy's person and the Spirit Speaking through her? I know (and we should all know) that charity cannot come from hate, lies and accusations. Therefore, I ask again: what is the REAL purpose behind this? If the split truly occurs (and again, it won't be because of messages from Heaven given to us to warn all about the schism that will be originated by the enemies) do you not know it will only be because the Church will fall into darkness? If we are the ones following the True Teachings as they were (and still are) given to us, doesn't that make us faithful to the Truth rather than to the changes that we already know might be coming soon? Is the reason of your pressuring accusations a loving and suffered good-bye to us, few Catholics? Are you really doing all of this because you will miss some the few unfaithful and ignorant rebellious souls who left out of blindness? I'm sure you will be happy and faithful even without us, poor heretics who are concerned about this Pope's controversial words and the synod to come in October.
Should I fear Hell because I'm reading messages that not only predicted events perfectly, but are actually reminding us of the True Teachings of Our Lord? If many of this pope's statements already represent a threat to the dogmas, should we not keep our eyes and ears open as to preserve a distinctive line between REAL Truth and MIXED truth? As we should remind ourselves: the Church is a creature and not the creator; it is also a gift from God and as such, it belongs to Him: the WORD is its foundation and the EUCHARIST is its life. And since we know this, who do we listen to first? The Word of God or a pope who, so far, has already made statements and actions controversial enough to easily be defined as anti-Christian.
We, Catholics, must remember that our worship is towards God alone. The pope is not the founder, the creator and the owner of the Word and of the Church: he is instead a servant who, through sacred vows of obedience honors God at all times. When this is the case, the Pope is infallible as a reflection of his obedience to the Perfect Teachings of God. But, when this person utters words of disobedience and rebellion against the same teachings, he no longer can be defined as infallible since he and his collaborators are in clear pursuit of destroying God's Bride from within.

 Heresy Charges 

Burning at stakeOn one of these blogs, Maria Divine Mercy is declared to be guilty of heresy under the chapter: "The Automatic Excommunication of Maria Divine Mercy and her followers".
Interestingly, the author seems to have somehow grown to believe that, through his own personal, partial and imperfect human judgment, he was granted from God Himself the authority to condemn God's Words and Prophet (as well as His Messages' readers) through the use of unmerciful and accusatory words.
In the following quote he has also claimed that the content from "The Warning Second Coming" messages is fruit of plagiarism:

"The idea of a Warning, an Illumination of Conscience, is taken from the messages of Garabandal. The idea that many will die of shock at their sins, is taken from MY work, from MY book about Medjugorje and Garabandal. The idea that the Warning will prove that God exists is also taken from MY eschatological writings. These are not messages from God, they are messages concocted to deceive and manipulate people by combining some truth with falsehoods." (source:

Under the title "Rejection of the Catholic Church by Maria Divine Mercy" the blog writer presumptuously assumes that if a Catholic rejects Pope Francis (and those teachings of his own making), he or she is AUTOMATICALLY excommunicated (click here to see The Right and Duty to resist a Pope). This is an absolutely invalid statement – especially under the current papacy. In fact, we are called to discern first and never blindly believe the words of a man (since all men are born with the original sin) until proven trustworthy (after all, God gave us the wonderful faculty of reason). And since only God can and must be followed blindly, if a Christian soul blindly follows a man whose teachings are not of Jesus Christ, then that soul falls into grave error. A Pope's Teachings are infallible if they adhere to Jesus' Teachings; in that case, we (just as we have done until now with all popes) follow and obey him. But if we consider that "pope" Francis  has already broken some of the traditional rules of Christ (one being the Washing of the Feet) and has spoken words of rebellion against His Laws ("A divorcee who takes communion is not doing anything wrong”) then he is not to be trusted. If/when he (and his collaborators) officially change parts of the doctrine in writing, we would be committing a mortal sin by remaining in such church; one reason would lay in the simple fact that by accepting new teachings we would prove to have never known God's Word to begin with. Another reason, as a consequence, would be the changes this new doctrine's commandments would bring in us. In such case we surely know that the Church would no longer be the Infallible Mystical Body founded on God's Verb. We must remind ourselves that, although the Church IS the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ, we are not in worship of it. The only worship we give (within and without the Church) is towards God, Who Is Present within It through the Eucharist and the Word. Shall Those Two Be changed in any given way, the man-formed Catholic Clergy and Community would instantly become part of a pagan temple. Conclusively, Maria Divine Mercy's messages not only do not reject the Catholic Church, but defend it while warning its members of the dangers coming their way. The Words given to her in regards to the Church are for the formation of the Remnant Army through selection: those that accept His Message (and who will become part of that army) and those who don't (and who will blindly continue on the path towards honoring a lie).

Here are the words from the above mentioned article:    

"As I explained previously, any Catholic who rejects Pope Francis commits the mortal sin of schism and is automatically excommunicated. And it should be clear that any Catholic who rejects the Catholic Church as a whole — as the messages of MDM are asking them to do — also commits the mortal sin of schism.

Here are some excerpts from recent messages to MDM that reject the Catholic Church as a whole:

“The Catholic Church will make a number of alarming statements, as to why it has to change and amend every part of its structure.”
“the Catholic Church will become a leading force in the new one world religion.” (message of 1 Nov 2013)
“My Catholic Church on earth will be sucked into a one world church, in the name of unification.” (message of 16 May 2012)“My Son’s Church will become the seat of the antichrist…. My Son’s Church will be persecuted, destroyed, desecrated — until eventually, it will house the throne upon which will sit the antichrist.” (message of 29 Oct 2013)“Within six months of the heresy being introduced into My Church, many who ignored My Call, will flee and seek out those who remained true to My Holy Word. Then My Army will swell, grow and gather the remnants from all Christian churches and fight the spirit of evil.” (message of 20 Oct 2013)

On the one hand, the messages warn against a unification of Christians in the one Catholic Church, the unification that Jesus prayed for: “So may they all be one. Just as you, Father, are in me, and I am in you, so also may they be one in us” (John 17:21). If any Pope attempts to bring separated Christian groups (Orthodox, Protestants) back to the one true Faith, the messages of MDM condemn the very effort.

On the other hand, these same messages claim to unite persons from “all Christian churches” under one visionary (MDM) and one set of claimed private revelations. So if the Pope and the Catholic Church attempt and eventually succeed in bringing separated Christians (like the prodigal son) back to the one Catholic Christian Family and the sole Ark of Salvation, these messages would condemn the true Church as an evil “one world religion”. But these same message attempt to do the same thing, to unite persons from all Christian churches."

Clearly, the critic writing these lines has failed to understand what is contained in these messages.

Jesus' Desire for a United Church is still alive – more than ever. He desires ALL His children to come together in the Unity of the Holy Spirit as the True Church. This will be, indeed, the Remnant Church:

And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the Commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." Revelation 12:17

The word 'Remnant' means 'remains', what is left of out of all churches. The one group that keeps all commandments.
Now, THIS is also the Church against which the gates of Hell shall never prevail. That "seed" is Christ. The Remnant of that Seed is what remains of that Mystical Body that is the Catholic Church and which will be formed by all those who will keep all God's Commandments until the end. All these people will come from different backgrounds: Protestants, former atheists, former Muslims…
THIS is God's Dream for us: that people shall unite in the Seed to honor the Seed's Teachings while Having the Testimony of Jesus Christ.
Now, Christ Has Been repeatedly Saying that His Desire is for all to unite in HIM.  He's also Saying this because the Catholic Church, even though it IS His Mystical Body, will fall. This is not to be understood as "The Mystical Body betrays Himself" but "those wolves who serve Satan while wearing the robes of the Clergy" will betray, destroy, change and spit upon the Church of Christ. This is what Christ Meant when He Said:

So may they all be one. Just as you, Father, are in me, and I am in you, so also may they be one in us. (John 17:21)

He also States:

"Only the Church of God, which remains faithful to My Teachings, is infallible. Once that bond – the bond where only the Truth is declared in My Name – is broken, they become separated from Me. I Am the Church. You, My followers, My sacred servants, are part of Me when you adhere to My Holy Doctrine. The Church – My Church – will remain intact, for the Truth can never change. Those who separate from Me can not be part of My Church on Earth."
Message of Thursday, September 19th, 2013 – 

Again, Christ Tells us that the Catholic Church IS Perfect as long as It Follows His Teachings. This is a very simple concept to understand since it already happened when He Was rejected and condemned to death by His Own Church that very first time He came.
Now, the condemnation of God towards the unification of all denominations in one Church is due to the following:

"Religious differences will be blurred around the edges at first. Then, within a short time, you will not recognize My Teachings, for they will have subtly disappeared. In their place will be a series of vague, but poetic, utterances, which promote the tolerance of sin."
Message of  Tuesday, October 9th, 2012 – The Book of Truth

It is obvious that the unification Christ Is Speaking of is under a doctrine that will subtly but surely deny Him and His Teachings.
Further, by saying "On the other hand, these same messages claim to unite persons from “all Christian churches” under one visionary (MDM) and one set of claimed private revelations" the blogger seems to have forgotten about the prophets' roles in history.

"God Said to Noah: 'I am going to put an end to all people, for the earth is filled with violence because of them. I am surely going to destroy both them and the earth. So make yourself an ark of cypress wood; make rooms in it and coat it with pitch inside and out. This is how you are to build it: The ark is to be 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet high. Make a roof for it and finish the ark to within 18 inches of the top. Put a door in the side of the ark and make lower, middle and upper decks. I am going to bring floodwater on the earth to destroy all life under the heavens, every creature that has the breath of life in it. Everything on earth will perish. But I will establish my covenant with you, and you will enter the ark–you and your sons and your wife and your sons' wives with you. You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you. Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground will come to you to be kept alive. You are to take every kind of food that is to be eaten and store it away as food for you and for them.' Noah did everything just as God commanded him." (Genesis 6)

God is clearly instructing His Prophet Noah by telling him how to build the Ark and who to bring into it. He Entrusts His Mission unto Noah's ability and faith to accomplish it on his own as all rest of humanity thought of him as a crazy fanatic (and the same thing could be said of Moses, who alone was to free from slavery the people of the Lord). That Ark of Salvation has always been used to represent the Catholic Church, which shall save its people from the floods of the world. And soon, as 'the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God' (2 Thessalonians 2:4), the waters of the flood will enter the Temple of God and corrupt it. But since 'the gates of hell shall not prevail against it', the truly faithful followers of God will enter a New Covenant in what are the remains of the Catholic  Church: a New Ark with an army inside. "Only the Church of God, which REMAINS faithful to My Teachings, is infallible…You, My followers, My sacred servants, are part of Me when you adhere to My Holy Doctrine. The Church – MY Church – will REMAIN intact, for the Truth can never change."

will report, here below, a small part of a whole long essay written by the same author who is attempting to destroy the validity of The Warning Second Coming messages.  This is just one example of many showcasing a completely erroneous analysis and displays the author's simple misunderstanding of the teachings; the misguiding breakdown of them shows a grave lack of syntax, logical form, and understanding. The writer's words are written next to the gray bar:

The message of April 6th 2011 is titled: "Never judge other religions, creeds or sexual preferences." This message portrays Jesus as using the phase 'sexual preferences' repeatedly. The phrase implies that sexual orientation is merely a personal preference. But Jesus condemned every type of fornication (sexual sin), and He also condemned homosexuality as inherently disordered, and as leading toward grave sin:

WRONG: Jesus states in a message on Friday, March 16 2012 "Same sex sexual acts are not acceptable in My Father’s Eyes". Additionally, in a message from Tuesday, April 19 2011 He Says: "While those of you, caught up in a world of promiscuity, sexual deviation and abuse of others, will argue that these acts are a source of amusement and in some cases a form of income – you must know they will be your passport to the eternal flames of Hell. For every depraved sexual act you participate in, so too will your body, even though you will be in spirit, burn as if in the flesh, for eternity. Each part of the human body you abuse through mortal sin will suffer the most pain in the fires of Hell". This shows His clear condemnation of ALL sexual acts as quoted here below.
[Mark]{7:21} For from within, from the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders,

{7:22} thefts, avarice, wickedness, deceitfulness, homosexuality, an evil eye, blasphemy, self-exaltation, foolishness.
{7:23} All these evils proceed from within and pollute a man."

The message of April 6th 2011 does not merely tell people not to judge persons, but not to judge actions, even those directly contrary to the moral law. This message is contrary to the teaching of the Church and of the Gospels.

"Never tell those of different creeds or sexual preferences they are doomed To push My teachings in a manner where you tell those who are not followers that they will perish or come to harm by brandishing their ways as 'evil' will simply render them weaker than before." (message of 6 Apr 2011)

WRONG: Jesus Stated "Never tell THOSE of different creeds or sexual preferences THEY ARE DOOMED." He's clearly saying to people of faith not to judge the sinner (with the obvious understanding that the faithful people He's Speaking to already know these actions to be sinful)

The above message mixes some truth with error. We should not judge persons, telling them they are doomed (condemned), since they might repent. But some persons certainly do live ways that are morally evil. Sacred Scripture condemns these ways of living that lead to eternal condemnation:

CONTRADICTION: the critic betrays himself by saying "But some persons certainly do live ways that are morally evil. Sacred Scripture condemns THESE WAYS OF LIVING that lead to eternal condemnation." Therefore, we are indeed to not condemn the sinner but the sin as Jesus Said in the lines above and as Scriptures declare here below.
[Galatians]{5:19} Now the works of the flesh are manifest; they are: fornication, lust, homosexuality, self-indulgence,

{5:20} the serving of idols, drug use, hostility, contentiousness, jealousy, wrath, quarrels, dissensions, divisions,
{5:21} envy, murder, inebriation, carousing, and similar things. About these things, I continue to preach to you, as I have preached to you: that those who act in this way shall not obtain the kingdom of God.

The message of 6 Apr 2011 contradicts this passage from Sacred Scripture. It is a message designed to appeal to those believers who have been led astray by modern society into thinking that sexual orientation is merely a preference that is not in itself morally disordered. To the contrary, the Catholic Church teaches:
"Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that 'homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.' They are contrary to the natural law." (CCC, n. 2357).

WRONG: Jesus states in a message on Friday, March 16 2012 "Same sex sexual acts are not acceptable in My Father’s Eyes". Additionally, the blog owner erroneously misquotes Jesus' Words by adding his own spin based on his stubborn adversity to these messages. He says "It is a message designed to appeal to those believers who have been led astray by modern society into thinking that sexual orientation is merely a preference that is not in itself morally disordered"
OPPOSITE: The fact that Jesus used the expression "sexual preference" tells us instead that, although it being a grave sin, we are not to judge people based on their choices. 

We shall rather quote Pope Francis in regards to this: "Who am I to judge a gay person?" when asked about homosexuality among the priests.

"Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder." (Cardinal Ratzinger, Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons)

AGAIN: As quoted above, Jesus Words remain firm: "Same sex sexual acts are not acceptable in My Father’s Eyes".

Today, instead, we hear all other kinds of statements among the Catholic Clergy: let's not forget that Cardinal Timothy Dolan said on Sunday, March 09 2014: "Pope Francis is asking the Catholic church to look at the possibility of recognizing civil unions for gay couples". Not to mention pro gay civil union bishops like Gerard Daucourt, bishop of Nanterre: "I, for my part, want to take heed of homosexual unions, I want to recognize them, accompany  them.  I have known a certain number of homosexual couples,". And among many others and not to our surprise, the same Dublin's Archbishop Diarmuid Martin who CONDEMNED the messages given to Maria Divine Mercy (in which homosexuality is unacceptable) is in strong support of Gay Civil Unions. As you can read in his statement below, he uses the trick of "tolerance" and "human rights" to inflate a dangerous generalization in which all the faithful are automatically hateful, intolerant and judgmental towards the gay community. He uses the word "God" to coin a new negative category of believers who simply uphold the truth: this category is the "Godophobic", of which St. Paul certainly is part of:

"For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a base mind and to improper conduct" Romans 1:26-28

The Words of Dublin Archbishop Diarmuid Martin on Gay People and "Godophobics"

Archbishop of Dublin Diamuid Martin speaks about Maria Divine Mercy"Discussions have to be carried out in a ‘mature’ way so that people can freely express their views, while at the same time being respectful and not causing offense," he said. He said that in general he believed it was the person who was offended who defined what being offended is."Anyone who grew up in Ireland would have told jokes that were pointed at the gay community; at Travelers [gypsies]; it is part of the culture we grew up in, but we have to grow out of it," he said. He said church teaching was that marriage was between a man and a woman, exclusively, but that this approach did not exclude gay people from celebrating their union by a different means.”…‘God never created anybody that he doesn’t love.’ Speaking to the Irish Independent, the senior cleric said this meant that ‘anybody who  doesn’t show love towards gay and lesbian people is insulting God. They are not just homophobic if they do that – they are actually Godophobic because God loves every one of those people’…“He added: ‘We all belong to one another and there is no way we can build up a society in which people are excluded or insulted. We have to learn a new way in Ireland to live with our differences and for all of us to live with respect for one another."

Some other similar quotes from the Bishop of Dublin:

"You don't write off a candidate for the priesthood simply because he is a gay man." – The Irish Times, October 2005

"I appreciate how gay and lesbian men and women feel on this day (the day gay marriage was legalized in Ireland). That they feel this is something that is enriching the way they live. I think it is a social revolution." – BBC, May 2015

"We had created a religion of fear, so much that even when we tried to live the good life, we were never left with a sensation of being free. For many, Christianity had been turned into a faith of prohibitions.  Certain theologies spoke about freeing people from sin but had developed a concept of sin and sinner which made it almost impossible for a sinner ever to feel himself or herself truly liberated.  There were so many rules that many were left with a sense of scrupulosity, which left them trapped and oppressed by guilt and doubts." – The Irish Times, April 2017


We will now emphasize only one of a longer list of "blasphemies" allegedly committed by the woman behind The Warning Second Coming messages. We just found unreasonable to list the entire "inventory" of "sins" provided by those who ferociously accuse Maria Divine Mercy of nothing less than heresy. Here below is one accusation we wanted to analyze as an example:

 * the "heresy" of claiming killing is only moral in self-defense, and not also in the death penalty and in just war

Electric chairIt is a source of discouraging concern to observe that still today, so little of what God Has Taught is being understood in its simplicity by those who profess to hold full knowledge of God's Word. 

To kill in the same way Christ was killed – through death penalty – is murder. We of The WILD VOICE feel challenged by this thick wall that, to our faith and reason, is nothing other than a list of illogical man-created complex codes and laws which have come to contrast the same foundations God Laid through His Commandments. 

"THOU SHALT NOT KILL" never was followed by further subcategories listing the exceptions under which this absolute law should no longer be applied. Since the act of killing simply is –and always will be– unjustifiable in God's Eyes, it remains a mortal sin. This, without question, applies to Death Penalty as well. Indeed, capital punishment falls into the premeditated and willful first degree murder category lawfully practiced by nations and states which, in defiance of God's Commandments, justify such evil in their secularism. No matter how grave another person's evil doings may be, his or her imprisonment should be the only option available. 

In the extreme case of self-defense such law is reasonably inapplicable in its absolute terms, considering that God's Created human nature is instantly and instinctively prone to preserve itself intact from harm or death. It must also be a case of which reasons are valid and just according to God's moral Laws. Whether or not we may understand if our killing of a neighbor in self-defense is acceptable by God depends on several factors.

6)   Scriptural Interpretations

A person who has a hateful blog antagonizing these messages has foolishly made the mistake of writing the following:

"Now you bring up Gospels? So who do you believe? Was Jesus raised in Nazareth or was he – like many New Age practitioners claim – travelling around the world, to India, England – MDM's version of 'gospel'. And were there two thieves crucified with Jesus as the Gospels tell us, or five as MDM claims? Were all the disciples fishermen as MDM claims (because she does not know the Bible) or was she wrong there because Matthew was a tax collector. How may temples did Jews have? The Bible tells us there was only one. MDM keeps writing about Jewish temples. These are just a few factual errors. I guess she is testing the gullibility of her followers – how far can she go and they will still believe her? Congratulations, you have passed her test. No matter how stupid her messages are you will still cling to them.
Which makes my point. You refuse to believe the Church and the Bible so you are now in a kind of stupor that you cannot snap out of."

Without spending any time commenting on both its rudeness and misused grammatical morphemes, the unfortunate testimony lacks of faith, logic, humbleness, reason and intelligence. Its smallness lies in the commentator's pride of believing to know all things rather than just believing.
This individual hiding his/her name states that, because in the Bible there is no mention of Christ traveling during the unknown 90% of His Existence on Earth, it is assumed that He Lived in Nazareth all His Life. This is an example of trying to disprove something through lack of proof (a senseless method). In fact, the mere fact that the Gospels do not mention anything whatsoever in regards to Christ's life and whereabouts during His hidden 30 years (with the exception of His Birth, His Going to Egypt as a baby and His visit to the Temple) should not be used to disprove what no one can prove. It's a process similar to the theory of "guilty until proven innocent".
It's also true that, although not reported in Scriptures or through scholarly literature, the story of Jesus visiting Britain is no news in some Christian traditions: the belief that He Visited the island as a boy is a late medieval development based on stories connected with Joseph of Arimathea.
All that can be said in regards to this issue is that as it is impossible to prove the absolute truth of such theory, so it is also impossible to prove its absolute untruth without any proof whatsoever; and besides, such notion in regards to "traveling" remains absolutely irrelevant in the larger picture as it holds no altering influence on the Teachings of God. Not to mention that modern scholarship, by holding that there is too little historical information to determine what happened during those years, is open to any possibility. After all, we Catholics believe in the Assumption (and Coronation) of Our Lady into Heaven in Body and Soul when no such information (although of much higher theological and eschatological importance) is contained in the Bible.

Jesus on cross with thievsThe same can be said about the issue regarding the two thieves next to Christ: the message did not deny in any way whatsoever the traditional truth of two thieves having been condemned next to Him during the agony on the Cross. What the message states is that there were two more condemned people. On that day, there could have been 500 more crucified people: having two crosses, five crosses, fifty crosses or five thousand of them on Mt. Golgotha does not disprove the credibility of the message or prove any incongruence with the Gospels whatsoever. As far as we know there could have been a decapitated head ten feet away from Christ's Cross and nine soldiers next to His Mother: many details were not reported as they would have been irrelevant. 

Rather, here is another Message He Left, proving both the confirmation of Truth in these Revelations and the confirmation of deceitful omission of Truth in the above accusations:

The Book of Truth Online
November 10, 2011

My dearly beloved daughter, when I was dying on the Cross, two thieves were close by, they too being crucified at the same time.

One asked Me to forgive him his sins and was saved. The other did not. Instead, he turned a deaf ear. His stubbornness and refusal to ask for My Mercy meant that he could not be saved.The same will happen during The Warning. Some of My children will acknowledge their sins and accept that they have offended Me. They, in all humility, will accept their penance and will be saved. They will enter the New Paradise in the forthcoming Era of Peace.Then there will be those who will not accept their sins for what they are, an abomination in the Eyes of God the Eternal Father.I will give these souls plenty of time to repent, such is the depth of My Mercy. Pray that they will seek redemption in order that they too can be saved. I want all My children to embrace My great Gift of Mercy. I want all of you to enter the gates of the New Paradise.Pray that hardened souls will soften and accept My Hand. Pray that they will learn how to become humble in My Eyes.
Yours Jesus
Redeemer of Mankind

Pride will push anyone into perceiving himself/herself to be God in the same way Lucifer did.
Let's now read what the same "faithful" people might not tolerate either considering that the following words are not included in the Bible. Yet, the Catholic Church has fully approved the verity of the book from which this paragraph was taken: the book is The Mystical City of God, the wonderfully written masterpiece by Venerable Mary of Agreda.

"…The heavenly Lady, upon hearing the words of the holy man, answered in the words of the Magnificat, as She had done on her visit to saint Elisabeth, and She added other canticles. She was all aflame in ecstasy and was raised from the earth in a globe of light, which surrounded Her and transfigured Her with the gifts of glory"
(from The Mystical City of God – Book 4, Chapter 1)

NEVER did we know of Mary's Transfiguration since the Gospels make no mention of such event. Should we then accuse these writings to be heretical is their essence by teaching untold and unproven facts?

I will withhold from continuing my analysis on the remaining discrediting accusations that so much remind us of those uttered in the name of heresy by the all-knowing high priests 2,000 years ago against Jesus Christ. 



Disclaimer: We claim no copyright to any of the content from the 'Book of Truth'. We, of course, are praying for all souls with fervent love and compassion because we are all God's creatures. We pray for all to come to the Truth in simplicity and joy the same way children would. We have no enemies except for the evil one who wants to work within each one of us and through the world around us. We must remain peaceful and united in the Holy Spirit of Truth and within the Catholic Church made of the faithful followers of the Lord.


15 comments for “Attack Blogs and Lobbies Against Maria Divine Mercy, The Messages, and Their Readers – PART II

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *