New World Pope Francis – Analysis of Statements and Events

SHARE

In this time of confusion, the Ark of the Covenant seems to be helplessly lost between the mighty winds and the agitated waters of a furious tempest, striving to survive against an ocean poisoned with contradictions and statements of unclear nature (to say the very least). See Pope Francis – A Chronology for a full list of statements and headlines.
For now, let us analyze some additional material in the attempt to build a realistic profile based on evidence and deep understanding without the use of any prophecies.

In the two following quotes, we are told by False Prophet Pope Francis what the Church of Jesus Christ must become according to his personal preference and views.

 

 

I PREFER A CHURCH WHICH IS BRUISED  

"I prefer a Church which is bruised, hurting and dirty because it's been out on the streets, rather than a Church which is unhealthy from being confined and clinging to its own security"
Pope Francis I – November 26, 2013

"I can clearly see that what the Church needs today is the ability to heal wounds and warm the hearts of faithful, it needs to be by their side. I see the Church as a field hospital after a battle. It’s pointless to ask a seriously injured patient whether his cholesterol or blood sugar levels are high! It’s his wounds that need to be healed. The rest we can talk about later. Now we must think about treating those wounds. And we need to start from the bottom."
Pope Francis I – August 29, 2013

1)  The Bishop of Rome begins both statements with the word 'I', therefore putting his own self and his very own taste first. As we know, the Head of the Church is Jesus Christ, but no mention of His Name is present in either statement. This man is called "The False Prophet" for different reasons, and one of them is the absolute need to put himself as head and center of the Body of Christ as if the Church was his body. In this way, he personalizes the way in which the Ark must be according to his will – which is viewed as holy.

His views are seen as holy by two worlds:

a)  The Catholics who have been trained to accept any man who is wearing the sacred garments to be infallible, godly and holy without the need to discern. They blindly believe that a pope is automatically holy due to the "automatic" power of the Holy Spirit in positioning him in such place.
b)  The secular society, which perceives this man to be preaching in righteousness as he, the Vicar, demonizes what the Church has been so far (and its wrong doings) in order to change it into what he desires. The secular world would approve of only the one who comes to announce that the Mystical Body of Christ has been unfair, unmerciful, closed off, corrupt, rigid, unloving. 

Are those words we would use to describe Our Lord?

2)  "I prefer a Church…" minimizes the importance of THE Church as The Only Body of Christ. The article "a" reduces it to a generic and one of many bodies. The word "prefer" indicates a taste, a personal preference which is always changeable since we are all human. Furthermore, 'I prefer a Church' states that so far this Church has not been satisfying his ways and views.

3)  "..I prefer a Church which is bruised, hurting and dirty because it's been out on the streets…" tells us that the Church he will refashion will be in pain. Like all masons, Bergoglio hides his agenda by exposing it in plain view through statements so extreme to be interpreted as metaphors by the masses. In fact, such a negative plan of his must be turned into its opposite positive metaphor by a blind audience. By trying to emulate Christ's controversial teachings and thoughts, he cunningly speculates on the weak faith of people who fail to catch the egotistical and universe-centered prophet and his scandalously empty words. For Bergoglio to wish the Church to be bruised by having been out in the world might signify a number of things and yet, how would a secular world bruise the Church? Through which methods? Through persecution? Or by inflicting its evil teachings upon Her? Or through the infiltration of secret societies in its high places? To wish dirt and hurt on the Church is certainly not God's Will. In fact, when Christ said: "Blessed are those who suffer persecution in my name" He certainly did not intend to say that such is pleasing to Him; rather, He meant that since this World hated Him first (given the fact that it's led by Satan) so will it always hate those who follow Him and who consequently shall know they belong to Him. This further means that the Truth-rejecting secular world – that roaring lion seeking to devour the Bride – is the cause of bruises and pain achieved through disobedience to God's Holy Will. Would that kind of pain exist if the secular world no longer followed the beast but instead converted to the Truth?

Additionally, he is plainly saying that he desires Christ to once again be bruised, hurting and dirty as if during a new Passion. The vicar is exhibiting what is to come as prophecy so clear as to be invisible as much as unbelievable. These words are an insult towards Christ as they express a desire to torture God yet again by torturing his followers in the times ahead.

In the second statement, instead, he says "I can clearly see that what the Church needs today is the ability to heal wounds and warm the hearts of faithful, it needs to be by their side. I see the Church as a field hospital after a battle. It’s pointless to ask a seriously injured patient whether his cholesterol or blood sugar levels are high…"
If compared to the first statement, it is clear that we are witnessing an unjustifiable contradiction. How can a bruised, hurting and dirty Church also be the hospital after battle with the ability to heal wounds?
Let's now unite the two thoughts in one:
In accordance to this Pope's will, the Church must be an injured and dirty hospital for the injured and dirty sinners who need to be consoled without Jesus Christ, Whose Name Is not mentioned and Whose Own Injuries – caused by the sinners themselves – are irrelevant according to Bergoglio's forgetfulness.  

4)  "…rather than a Church which is unhealthy from being confined and clinging to its own security" Pope Francis tells us that he would rather have a suffering Church with bruises and dirt as if it had been out on the streets (therefore being homeless and without the security of its roof/faith) rather than an unhealthy Church in being confined and clinging to its own security.
The cunning tactics of Bishop Bergoglio may be effective to the masses but not to all: it is clear that another contradiction fails to bring the truth even to the most basic concepts. Here he adds the fundamentalist/extremist nature of his false convictions by saying:
A church (or a person) is unhealthy (ill) by clinging (fanatically holding on to) to its/his own security (beliefs and faith in Christ) and by being confined (imprisoned by those same dogmas) by it.

Therefore, the prophet's generic and misty message could be interpreted as follows:
a)  "I prefer a Church which is humiliated, homeless, dirty and in pain; a Church that is insecure in its faith and beliefs; a Church that is open to the secular world."
b)  "I prefer a church bruised by the sins of the world's streets from which it is no longer confined, while hurting because it has let go of its own security."

Once, a great martyr by the name of St. Thomas More said:  “Comfort in tribulation can be secured only on the sure ground of faith holding as true the words of Scripture and the teaching of the Catholic Church.”

As for the"bruised, hurting and dirty Church because it's been out on the streets" statement, we should know that unfortunately such reality is already existing: 14,000 Christians are martyred each year. Their bodies and temples are bruised on those very streets each day as this image shows

As this papacy is currently immersed in the process of creating a new, open Church of which reviewed laws might condone the first world secular society's sins (among which are "gay unions"), the reality of Christianity in other parts of the globe is comprised of mass persecutions, murders, torture, crucifixions and the bombing of churches.

Is the picture above a representation of what lies ahead for ALL Christians through the words and in the vision of Pope Francis?

"My Heart heaves at this time, for there is great hatred being shown to those who are practicing Christians. The persecution of Christians will continue in all countries and this includes all those who have, at this time, the freedom to practice their homage to Me. The greatest persecution will be inflicted by Christians upon Christians. The scourging of My Body on Earth will be at its worst from within, as brother will turn against brother and sister against sister. You will soon see the declaration of the new prayers, which will be introduced by the new liturgy"
Jesus' message on Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 from – The Book of Truth

 

"WHO AM I TO JUDGE A GAY PERSON?"
says Pope Francis

While his statement is correct and in line with the teachings of Our Lord, it lacks the second part: the diabolically planned omitted truth that crowned him as the "Gay Pope", the "Cool Pope", the "Human Rights Pope". Here is the result of the infallible marketing strategy behind such statement: 

But what is wrong with such loving and tolerant declaration?
First, he was asked by a reporter about the status of homosexual priests. Bergoglio's answer was given as a personal one by saying "who am I to judge?". Why did he make it personal? Is he not supposed to answer what the Catholic Church teaches based on the Word of God? Wouldn't he rather say "The Catholic Church says…" or "God teaches us that…". No. He chooses to bring HIMSELF in the center of the attention rather than Christ (Whom he does not even mention) as if his human and personal opinion was more relevant than those Dogmas he was entrusted with (but yet again: he's dressed like a pope, right?). The objective here is to make HIMSELF (and not Christ) look humble and loving to those who hate or do not know God. By using a teaching of the Lord to his personal advantage (in false humility he says he's not to judge) he misguides both believers and not believers into perceiving him to be modern, loving, tolerant and inattentive towards sin; he also cunningly draws a line between his way and the way of all who came before him in the name of the same Christ; therefore, in total invisible disobedience, pride, arrogance and vanity (masked by a facade of humility) he -and only he- appears to be loving, humble and merciful unlike both the old Church he represents (and towards which he already made a number of negative remarks) and the Head of it: Jesus Christ. This way, he first makes sure to steal Jesus' position as absolute head of the Church whose opinion is the most important, humble, loving and REVOLUTIONARY. Now: by omitting the rest of the Truth, which could have been expressed in hundreds of possible ways, he completes his task: to appear pro-homosexuality without ever saying it (omission of Truth, by the way, is still considered a grave sin in God's Eyes). THIS is how Satan works, deceives the masses, and captures those who feel secure in their faith. Since Bergoglio knew very well that what he was doing would have gained him world popularity and mediatic power, it goes without saying that once those results were reached he would never attempt to combat against his own doing: he would never throw away the crown he so longed to have. THIS is how we must break down the fortress of lies to free the Truth trapped within it.
Many Catholics, of course, would disagree with my words. To them I would ask to objectively try to "know them/him by their/his fruits" as they look again at the here above cover of America's #1 Gay Magazine THE ADVOCATE. Many of you would also say that it is the media doing so by manipulating this pope's words, but yet again: if Bergoglio found his words to be misunderstood (and the covers to be inappropriate) he would have already made public statements in order to clarify his position: so far he has failed to do so, therefore approving of what the media has constructed upon him.

As mentioned above, many could have been the statements made by him on this occasion. Many could have been the possibilities of expressing humility and lawfulness in such occasion and here are a few:

"Who am I to judge a gay person, but the sin remains grave in God's eyes"
"Who am I to judge a gay person, but Christ died for our sins and sodomy is grave in His Eyes"
"Who am I to judge a gay person, but the Church remains firm in its position in regards to sodomy"
"Who am I to judge a gay person, but homosexuality is intrinsically evil" (which is what Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI stated at the cost of being hated by the world and the media)
"Who am I to judge a gay person? We love the sinner but hate the sin as it costs God to lose his soul"

We could list dozens of possible answers – all aligned with the Teachings of the Church – but he chose not to expand, explain, underline the gravity of the sin. In this diabolical way, he comes across as the revolutionary lover of mankind who turns God into an only-merciful and all-tolerant entity who does not judge but condones all sins for love. The subtle deceit, here, rather, lies in what is not said, which becomes the exact source of praises and magazine covers in HIS (and only HIS) honor. In fact, it's as if the media portrays him as a separate and open-minded element who is attacked by and carrying the weight of an old, unfortunate, intolerant, uncool, and soon-to-be-totally-reformed Church. It seems as if the world is impatiently waiting for this cool pope to finally free society of this old carriage full of outdated and intolerant laws with which he, Bergoglio, seems to have little to do with.

PROSELYTISM IS SOLEMN NONSENSE

 "Proselytism is solemn nonsense, it makes no sense. We need to get to know each other, listen to each other and improve our knowledge of the world around us."
Pope Francis I

Apparently, proselytism is total nonsense to the Vicar of that Christ Who Ordered His Beloved disciples to go into the world of darkness to bring the Light, the Truth, the Way and the Life so that all may come to know God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. If this was not enough of a blasphemous statement against the promises of our Baptism, he adds that we need to improve our knowledge of the world around us by also embracing dialogue. Dialogue, as all things except SIN, can be for good or evil. Not only Christ never Taught once about dialogue when dealing with His Teachings, but Showed to us that the Absolute Truth is unchangeable; it cannot be corrupt by opening up to others' ideologies, creeds, social statuses, races, sexual orientations, cultures or opinions. To use such word (dialogue) in such a generic statement he opens the uncountable possibilities of personal and faulty interpretations and choices that lack direct, clear and carefully prepared direction in the Spirit of God.

We, Catholics, have the duty to discern the words that are uttered by anyone who comes in the name of the Lord as if we were sentinels at night. We know that the worst enemies will be those wolves dressed in sheep's clothes, whether they are priests, bishops, cardinals or a specific pope: that one false prophet who will be given power, love, admiration, popularity and fame beyond any predecessor.
Let's ask ourselves one question: How can the Vicar of the Crucified Lord, Who Suffered and Died brutally at the hands of those who claimed to represent His Father (the Church of His time) gain so much admiration, publicity, popularity, love and approval from today's Christians and non-Christians alike? How can so many atheists suddenly fall in love with him when they clearly hate the Teachings of the Church he represents? How can so many homosexuals who spat on Christ and His Bride up until sixteen months ago now love this man? Would this person be loved as much if he had continued to proclaim the Truth entirely as It always was, is, and always will be? No, my dear friends, it is not possible indeed. Not even miracles can do so. We know that the world hates the Truth and killed It, as it killed all those who promoted it (from the Apostles to the Martyrs of the First Church, from the Saints to the Missionaries all over the globe). Always. The Cross is the only way and Pope Bergoglio is clearly not carrying it.

 

"INEQUALITY IS THE ROOT OF SOCIAL EVIL"
says False Prophet Francis I

"Inequality is the root of social evil" is the infamous tweet that made so many eyebrows raise among all Christian churches and communities. 

According to commonwealmagazine.org, Joe Carter of the social-justice think tank The Acton Institute responded quickly: "Um, no it's not. Hate and apathy are the roots of social evil". Non-Catholic Mollie Hemingway was likewise confused. "I don't understand what this is supposed to mean, exactly," she tweeted, later suggesting "envy and coveting" were really to blame for social evil. Former Catholic Rod Dreher found himself flummoxed too: "What does that even mean?" He continued: "Twitter pronouncements like the Pope’s are simplistic and confusing."  (Source: "U.S. conservatives frightened & confused by pope's moral world" – commonwealmagazine.org)

The grave consequence behind this daring remark is that, by declaring such an absolute statement through a politically correct utterance that so much complies with today's society's desire to make all things equally acceptable – in one word, SIN – Pope Francis automatically rooted out the deeper reason that lays at the true foundations of this same issue: "The  disobedience to God's Laws". All Christians know – or should know – that the very root of all evil and sins is the Original Sin, which was the very first act of disobedience toward God and His Commandment. This sin is also called "Pride", the mother of all personal and social darkness: greed, intolerance, hatred, war, selfishness, murder, envy, adultery to mention a very few. As customarily done by Bergoglio, the results are achieved through puzzling statements that may be later reinterpreted, denied, or partly modified by either his spokespersons or by some Catholic bloggers and ministers who always seem to quickly blame the media for such confusion.
One thing we surely know is that such amount of doctrinally ambiguous declarations never appeared with any other Pope in history. Therefore, how can the media be blamed for being the manipulative filter responsible for altering Pope Bergoglio's pronouncements when the same media never achieved such results during Pope Benedict XVI's Papacy? Pope Benedict XVI was never misunderstood by the media because he spoke the Truth eloquently and firmly – leaving no room for a possible misinterpretation or manipulation. His words were always like a "solid rock" on which no secular castle could ever be built.
In Francis' case this does not apply: even if we were to believe that the long list of anti-dogmatic statements he pronounced were only the fruit of the misleading reinterpretation of the media, still "it takes two to make a baby". The various magazines and newspapers still need the "fertile, soft and moist" material in which to plant and grow their tree of agendas.
The Media knew all along that this man from Buenos Aires, the False Prophet, was to be elected as the new Vicar of Christ. They knew this because they (the mainstream bank-owned media) belong to those who fight against the freedom and peace that all human beings desire. They are the very enemies of God who for centuries have been unceasingly working to bring the dark night onto the world in a way never witnessed before. This, indeed, brings to light the real reason of such sudden excitement with which the media announced Mr. Bergoglio to be the new Holy Father: suspiciously unjustified from its very beginning, the enormous campaign of endless praises and words of glorification appearing on the magazine covers seen on these pages (and on all the newspapers, television news, blogs, books, comic books, and more) are part of a large hidden masonic web controlling the entire globe through Media, Politics, Religions, Human Rights Associations, Scientific and Social Engineering Institutions, the Education System, Governments, Food and Agricultural Organizations, the world of Entertainment, the Pharmaceutical Industry, the Military Industrial Complex, and last but not least: the Banking Cartel.
After all it wasn't too long ago that an imprudent mistake was made by BBC in reporting the collapse of the WTC Building #7 prior to its actual demolition —
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s
This incident – as well as all others – shall never be forgotten when it comes to wars, terrorism, politics, corporations, economics…and the Catholic Church.
It's no coincidence that Jesus once Said:
"Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves" Matthew 10:16

 

LIES! I WAS DECEIVED!

"Our Lady was human! And perhaps she even had the desire to say 'Lies! I was deceived!'"
Pope Francis I

Once upon a time, a belief of undoubted nature declaring the Most Holy Mother of Christ to be sinless in Her Immaculate Conception was part of the foundations upon which was to be found further elevation of the already Perfect dual nature of the God-Man Jesus Christ. Such belief, held since the Third Century, reached its status of dogma on December 8, 1854 under Pope Pius IX and ever since it maintained its unshakable veracity. Now, on the dawn of a new age in which all that is truth falls victim to the destructive interrogations of relativism, another home of the Mystical City of God is being burgled into. The day of the death of this dogma is December 20, 2013 when the words of Pope Francis disassembled the perfect nature of Our Lady through assembling the following statements:

I would like to quote some of the very insightful thoughts of Mr. Thomas A. Droleskey, Ph.D:

"Jorge Mario Bergoglio continues to demonstrate that almost everything he believes concerning what he represents as the Catholic Faith is but a mere invention of his very warped Modernist mind.

For example, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is on a crusade to portray himself as a latter-day "prophet," a veritable Twenty-first Century version of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ who is being criticized and persecuted by the "Pharisees" of today just as Our Lord Himself had been in His. Bergoglio, who prides himself on being so very humble and simple, you understand, does not realize that he has reached the point of self-caricature with his incessant screeds against a tiny fraction of people inside of his counterfeit church of conciliarism who are in any way attached to the slightest expression of the authentic, immutable patrimony of Catholic Tradition, including, of course, even the modernized version of the Immemorial Mass of Tradition that is called the "extraordinary form" of the "one" Roman Rite in the conciliar church. There is really no further need to comment on this self-caricature, other than to point out that it is but of many examples of Bergoglio projecting onto the Divine Redeemer his own "random" thoughts.

Similarly, it has not been enough for Bergoglio to blaspheme Our Lady by projecting onto her the disorderly inclinations that are part of the fallen human nature she was preserved from by virtue of her Immaculate Conception. Bergoglio has shown us that he has no knowledge of and/or contempt for the doctrinal effects of the Perfect Integrity that Our Lady enjoyed as a result of her Immaculate Conception." "Bergoglio reached a new low in this regard even by his own foul standards of blasphemous indecency…"

"Our Lady, the Queen of Martyrs, accepted the will of God the Father for His Co-Equal and Co-Eternal Son, her own sole begotten Son, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, without regret or complaint. She suffered, to be sure, as no human being had suffered before her or would suffer after her until the end of time. She suffered because she saw the unspeakable wretched effects that our sins, having transcended time, had on the very Body that she had given Our Lord in her Virginal and Immaculate Womb. Our Blessed Mother suffered in complete compassion with her Divine Son and was grieved greatly by the ingratitude of sinful men for whom He was shedding every single drop of His Most Precious Blood to redeem and who she would bring to spiritual rebirth in great agony as she stood so valiantly at the foot of His Holy Cross"
(source:  http://www.christorchaos.com/Blasphemer.html)

As The WILD VOICE has previously made use of excerpts from the book "The Mystical City of God" by Mary Agreda, we found that the quoting made by Thomas A. Droleskey from the same source could not be more proper in this case:

"As a reward for their tears and their compassion these women were enlightened so as to understand this doctrine. In fulfillment of the prayerful wish of the blessed Mother the pharisees and ministers were inspired with the resolve to engage some man to help Jesus our Savior in carrying the Cross to mount Calvary. At this  juncture, Simon, of Cyrene, the father of the disciples Alexander and Rufus (Mark 15, 21), happened to come along. He was called by this name because he was a native of Cyrene, a city of Lybia, and had come to Jerusalem. This Simon was now forced by the Jews to carry the Cross a part of the way. They themselves would not touch it, yea would not even come near it, as being the instrument of punishment for One whom they held to be a notorious malefactor. By this pretended caution and avoidance of his Cross they sought to impress the people with a horror for Jesus. The Cyrenean took hold of the Cross and Jesus was made to follow between the two thieves, in order that all might believe Him to be a criminal and malefactor like to them. The Virgin Mother walked very closely behind Jesus, as She had desired and asked from the eternal Father. To his divine will She so conformed Herself in all the labors and torments of her Son that, witnessing with her own eyes and partaking of all the sufferings of her Son in her blessed soul and in her body, She never allowed any sentiment or wish to arise interiorly or exteriorly, which could be interpreted as regret for the sacrifice She had made in offering her Son for the death of the Cross and its sufferings. Her charity and love of men, and her grace and holiness, were so great, that She vanquished all these movements of her human nature".
(The Venerable Mary of Agreda, The Mystical City of God, Volume III: The Transfixion, p. 637-638.)

"Plans are also underway to take over churches and various faiths including the Vatican. My Pope, My beloved Benedict, is surrounded by those plotting his downfall. Other world leaders, unaware of the underlying powers hidden within their own ranks, are also going to be targeted, with a view to toppling them."
Jesus' Words Friday, November 26th, 2010 -2 years and 79 days before Pope Francis' election from – The Book of Truth

 

"Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails"
St. Paul – 1 Corinthians

Brothers and sisters from all over the world: heed this voice from the wild and understand. When a man, or a woman, or a child, or a nation, or the world begin to believe that love can fail, we can count the hours left before hopelessness, suicide, depression, wars, envy, abortion…and divorce become a constant reality. When it is a "pope" who utters such statement, we might have to consider that the Book of Revelation is not wrong. It never was and never will be.
When the man who dresses in the robes of a Vicar of Christ takes his position of power within a Vatican that so long ago opened its doors to Masonic groups and Satanic sects sexually abusing children for their occult practices, we know that Satan is about to sit on the Throne of Peter.
For those of you who are Catholic like myself and go to church like I do, continue to do so. But, as soon as changes will be brought into the Sacrifice of the Mass, it will be of utmost importance that we cease attending. You will have to find a place where the 'old' Mass will still be celebrated.
Imagine for one minute if St. Paul had been hearing St. Peter utter the words that Jorge Bergoglio has pronounced about love. What do you think his reaction would have been? Do you think he would have accepted a teaching so contrary to the Truth imparted to us by Our Lord, Jesus Christ?
My dear friends, we must understand the difference between: being humble and being a coward; or being obedient to the Truth of God and being obedient to the lies cunningly masked behind a robe and a title; or remaining silent from engaging in evil arguments when being attacked or remaining silent as to maintain a false harmony for the sake of not being attacked and demonized.
Jesus Christ does not know what to do with a group of self-called Catholics who do not distinguish lies from truth!
Jesus Christ would never, ever declare love to be failing! Never! Never would He say such a thing from this moment until the never-ending eternity.
This statement came during one of the many occasions in which, through Bergoglio's words, divorce is being turned into a cross to bear, a suffering to feel compassion toward. Consequently, marriage can fail because love can fail. People do not fail, according to the pope, and sin is not the cause of that failure. What fails is LOVE. And love comes from God only because God Is Love. Therefore, we may translate the statement "When love fails, and it fails many times, we have to feel the pain of that failure, accompany the people who have felt the failure of their love" into "When God fails, and He fails many times, we have to feel the pain of His failure, accompany the people who have felt the failure of their God"
I beg of you, dear brothers and sisters who are hypnotized by this false light of false goodness: do not fail God. 

"When Jesus had finished saying these things, he left Galilee and went into the region of Judea to the other side of the Jordan. Large crowds followed him, and he healed them there. Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?"
"Haven’t you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate."
"Why then," they asked, "did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?" Jesus replied, "Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery." The disciples said to him, "If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry." Jesus replied, "Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it."
Matthew 19

"When they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this. He answered, "Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery."
Mark 10

It is clear that Christ's strict commandment is in total opposition to the 'teaching' of the Bishop of Rome. As an astute tactic, he uses his mark of recognition to manipulate the doctrine: tolerance. He says:
"Don't condemn them! Walk with them!" adding: "We have to be so close to the brothers and sisters who have suffered the failure of love in their lives".
He uses again the expression "failure of love" as a means to shift the failure of sinners onto God's love. By doing so, he blames love as the responsible and untrustworthy element guilty of hurting those who are now the victims to be protected; further, not only he protects the sin and the sinner, but he accuses those who uphold the Truth of being unloving and intolerant by using these words: 'Don't condemn them! Walk with them!'
This is exactly what Christ Said in the following words from the Warning Second Coming messages:

"The abolition of sin will be introduced through the introduction of laws which will be seen to endorse tolerance"
Message from Friday, July 20th, 2012 – The Book of Truth

And here are the words of Our Lord in regards to the Sacrament of Matrimony:

"…The Vow of Matrimony is very serious, for remember, it is a Sacrament and is made in the Presence of God the Father; yet for many it is all about materialism and the exterior trappings. Many who receive the Sacrament of Matrimony do not acknowledge its importance thereafter. Many break their vows so easily. Why do they do this? Why pay lip service to this most holy union only to part soon afterwards? This is a mockery of one of the most important unions blessed by the Hand of My Eternal Father. Many people do not pay any heed of My Father’s Will that no man shall pull asunder such a union thereafter, yet many people divorce, which is a law not recognized by My Father. Divorce is an easy way to run from your responsibilities. All marriages are made in Heaven. No man can destroy a marriage without offending My Father"
Message from Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 – given to Maria Divine Mercy

Although the 'defenders' of the former Cardinal constantly try to convince the believers that it is 'someone else' making prank phone calls in the name of Bishop Bergoglio, the same issue about divorce presents itself, with the same spirit, in the following article from The Telegraph  –

Pope Francis reportedly told a woman “living in sin” with a divorced man that she is free to take Holy Communion, in what appears to be a significant departure from Catholic teaching.
Jacqui Lisbona, who is from the Pope’s homeland of Argentina, wrote to the Jesuit pontiff to tell him that she had been refused Communion by her local priest, who objected to the fact that she was married to a previously divorced man. Prohibited from marrying in church, they had instead opted for a civil ceremony.
“[The priest] told me that every time I went home, I was going back to living in sin,” she said. In her letter, Mrs Lisbona, who has two teenage daughters with her current husband after 19 years of marriage, said she was worried that if she did take Communion – perhaps in a church where she was not known to the priest – she would be “violating Church rules”. The Pope, who since being elected 13 months ago has established a reputation for phoning ordinary Catholics out of the blue in response to letters they have sent, called her at her home in the central region of Santa Fe on Easter Monday. He reportedly told her: “A divorcee who takes communion is not doing anything wrong.” In a rebuke to the local priest who refused her the Sacrament, he added: “There are some priests who are more papist than the Pope.”…] [..The remarks may indicate that the Pope, who has struck a much more inclusive tone than his predecessor, Benedict XVI, on issues ranging from homosexuality to same-sex unions, is testing the water with the intention of changing the Church’s position. The surprising exchange was first revealed by Mrs Lisbona’s husband, Julio Sabetta, who said he first answered the call from the Pope, before handing the phone to his wife. “One of the most wonderful things in my life has just happened – receiving a telephone call from none other than Papa Francesco,” he wrote on his Facebook page. “We’re Catholics, we believe in God, and though we don’t go to Mass every Sunday, every evening we thank the Lord for our family and our work” Mr Sabetta, a pastry chef, said. The phone call from the Pope came six months after Mrs Lisbona sent her letter to him. Introducing himself as “Father Bergoglio” the South American pontiff said he was sorry it had taken him so long to make the call. “It is an issue we are discussing in the Vatican, because a divorcee who takes communion is not doing anything wrong,” the Pope reportedly said during a conversation lasting 10 minutes. The Catholic Church currently maintains that unless a first marriage is annulled, Catholics who remarry cannot receive Communion because they are essentially living in sin and committing adultery. Such annulments are often impossible to obtain, or can take years to process, a problem that has left many Catholics feeling rejected by the Church. Since being elected in March last year, Pope Francis has on several occasions called for a more merciful approach to the problem. In February he said divorced and separated couples should not be excluded from Church activities, in remarks which also raised speculation that he may one day lift the ban on divorcees receiving Communion. He told a group of Polish bishops that priests should “ask themselves how to help (divorced couples), so that they don't feel excluded from the mercy of God, the fraternal love of other Christians, and the Church's concern for their salvation.” He has also called on the Church hierarchy to re-evaluate the way that priests and bishops can engage with the children of same-sex couples and divorcees, urging them to "consider how to proclaim Jesus Christ to a generation that is changing". The push for a more inclusive approach towards divorced Catholics has been led by Cardinal Walter Kasper, a German theologian, who has called for "openings and changes" in how the Church confronts the issue. (source: The Telegraph)

It would seem apparent that Pope Bergoglio is moving towards a change in some aspects of the doctrine. Indeed, as said earlier, the strategy lays in trying to abolish the concept of sin through tolerance. Such objective is attainable when the person pursuing it possesses the role of Vicar of Christ.
To reinforce his liberal position, he simultaneously (and subtly) reprimands those whose role is to assist the sinner through the Sacrament of Reconciliation: the priests.

His role as the teacher, the new way, of establishing the relationship between the sinner and the church is very welcomed among the progressives and liberals.
It is important to underline one fact, especially for those who appear to be unaware of what is being realized at this time:

When a person publicly makes firm radical statements (or commits arguable actions) which have caused strong reactions among both the faithful and the secular, it should be expected to receive a direct explanation from that person. Just as if you or I were to make a comment that affected some of the people in our lives, we – normally and logically – would be called to directly address the issue without having a third party clarify the situation for us.
Pope Francis has been avoiding a direct explanation of his anti-dogmatic teachings by sending, instead, some spokespersons as is done in politics.
If the press was to be blamed for misinterpreting Bergoglio's doings, the bishop would certainly not hesitate to openly declare all that has been said to be falsely manipulated by the media. This would normally be done by the subject only, publicly and in front of the world's media; the list of all statements that were divulged should be addressed by the bishop of Rome in such clear manner as to leave no more room for any doubts. Having failed to do so, his silence continues to be a sign of approval of all that some widely ignored catholic blogs and unknown spokespersons have tried to adjust for the Catholic faithful. These secondary statements have done nothing to change the media portrait of this Pope because that is not the purpose of such; they are meant to keep the Catholics at bay by feeding them what they know is expected to be heard. But NEVER will we hear a single word from Jorge Bergoglio, whose popularity has flooded far beyond the walls of the old Catholic Church.    

FRANCIS FIRST COMMANDMENT: THOU SHALT SERVE THE POOR

"My child, the world will be deceived by many acts deemed to be works of great charity. Charity towards others will be declared to be the greatest and most desired trait in the Eyes of God."
Mother of Salvation's message, Wednesday, December 11th, 2013 from The Book of Truth

VATICAN CITY (CNS) — Christians believe they are saved by God's grace, but they also know they will be judged at the end of time on how they used the talents God gave them and how they served others, especially the poor, Pope Francis said.
"Today belief in Jesus' return and in the last judgment isn't always so clear and firm in Christians' hearts," the pope said April 24 at his weekly general audience. But "Jesus, during his public life, spoke frequently" about his coming again to judge the living and the dead.
After a long tour in the popemobile among the more than 80,000 people gathered in St. Peter's Square, Pope Francis continued his audience talks about the affirmations of faith in the creed. While teaching about belief in the second coming of Christ and the last judgment, Pope Francis also spoke about what it means to live in "the intermediary time," the time between the death and resurrection of Christ and his coming again.
It is a "time of vigilance when we must keep the lamp of faith, hope and charity burning, a time when we must keep our hearts open to goodness, beauty and truth. It's a time to live according to God, because we do not know the day or the hour of Christ's return," the pope said.
Christians continually must look for signs of God's presence, he said; they must be vigilant. "Do not fall asleep. The life of a sleeping Christian is a sad life."
Pope Francis also spoke about the importance of using the talents God gives each person, and — in both Italian and Spanish — he urged young people to recognize their gifts and seek ways to use them to serve God, others and the whole world.
"Do not be afraid to dream big dreams," he told them. Faith is a gift and salvation is a grace, he said, "but in order to bear fruit, God's grace requires us to be open, to give a free and concrete response."
The time of waiting for Christ's return is "a time for action," Pope Francis said. Especially at a time of global financial crises, people must use their gifts to help others. The parable in St. Matthew's Gospel about the Last Judgment — using the image of a shepherd separating the sheep from the goats — is not meant to frighten people, but to motivate them to act, the pope said.
The Gospel "tells us that we will be judged by God on our charity, on how we have loved our brothers and sisters, especially the weakest and neediest," he said. The time before the last judgment, he said, is a time given by God, who with mercy and patience, wants us "to learn to recognize him in the poor and the little ones, work for good and be vigilant in prayer and in love."
At the end of the audience, the pope personally greeted members of the Argentine group, Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo (Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo), which was formed in 1976 by relatives searching for the children of those detained during Argentina's so-called "dirty war." As many as 30,000 Argentines were kidnapped, tortured, murdered or disappeared between 1976 and 1983 under Argentina's military dictatorship, and many of those detained were seized along with their children. Argentine media reported that the group at the audience included Estela Carlotto, president of the Abuelas; Juan Cabandie Alfonsin, a member of the Buenos Aires city council and son of one of the disappeared; and Nicolas Gil Lavedra, director of the film "Verdades Verdaderas" ("True Truths") about the life of Carlotto.

 

UPDATES

The New World Order AntiPope Francis I has made many other statements since this article was originally published.  He has stated that Jesus 'begged forgiveness', taught that 'Mother Earth is the one who has given us life', praised Martin Luther, and made a joke about the Most Holy Trinity, and much, much more. 

For a complete list of quotes and headlines, please see:

PUTTING POPE FRANCIS INTO PERSPECTIVE

For a commentary highlighting just 13 of some of the False Prophet's most outrageous statements and actions, please see

13 ROTTEN FRUITS FROM THE BAD TREE

 

SHARE